Iran & US: heading for a showdown at the UN
By Souheila Al-Jadda MIR, April 30, 2006
On May 9th, the Foreign Ministers of the five permanent members of the United
Nations Security Council will meet to debate how to deal with the Iranian
crisis. Meanwhile, several analysts have already concluded that any outcome or
resolution passed will most likely lack the teeth of sanctions or military force
to compel Iran to surrender to international will and forgo its nuclear
ambitions.
For the past several months, both the United States and Iran have been
engaging in a tense diplomatic face-off, as the Bush administration attempts to
further isolate Iran internationally.
Many political observers, however, believe that Iran appears to be winning
the impending showdown.
Dr. Hosni Abadi, the Director of the Center for Research of Arab and
Mediterranean countries, says that by escalating the rhetoric and strengthening
its diplomatic front, Iran has succeeded in achieving almost all of its goals.
It has bought more time, kept the issue out of the Security Council and weakened
the Western position.
"Iran has not only planted divisions in the UN Security Council but also in
the Troika (Britain, France and Germany)," Abadi told Abu Dhabi TV. He pointed
to the fact that France insists that negotiations remain on the table.
George Naseef, a political analyst for the Lebanese Annahar newspaper agrees.
"The European position is different from the American one," Nasseef told
Al-Arabiya TV. "European nations want to continue negotiations through official
visits, pressures and diplomatic influence without any major escalations."
In a recent report to the UN Security Council, the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) said that Iran has not stopped enriching uranium and has
not been forthcoming about its nuclear activities during the one month the
Security Council gave Tehran to freeze all its nuclear activities.
But
this was no surprise to the international community, which listened to Tehran's
escalating rhetoric during the past month.
On April 9th, Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, announced with much
fan-fare that his country had joined the International Nuclear Club by enriching
uranium at 3.5 percent, the required amount for a civilian fuel reactor.
"I am officially announcing that Iran has joined a group of those countries
which have nuclear technology," Ahmadinejad said.
Iran views possession of nuclear technology as an unequivocal national right.
Western nations suspect Iran is developing nuclear weapons.
According to Navid Bahrouz, a correspondent for the Iranian TV channel
Al-Alam, Tehran's move towards enrichment "will give Iran an extra card on the
bargaining table in its showdown with the West and the IAEA."
Meanwhile, Tehran has been conducting a full-scale diplomatic offensive in
the Middle East and beyond. Iranian officials have visited many Arab nations to
reassure them that Tehran's nuclear program is exclusively for civilian
purposes. In the past month, senior Iranian officials met with their
counterparts from Sudan, Syria, Kuwait and Algeria among others�all of whom
confirmed Iran's right to possess nuclear technology.
Despite the defiant rhetoric coming out of Tehran, Iran's charm offensive
also appears to be working on Russia and China. Both reject taking harsh
measures against Iran. Qin Gang, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said, "We
believe that it is a correct choice to appropriately solve the Iranian nuclear
issue through diplomacy and negotiations."
As the May 9th date approaches, the US finds itself facing three main
obstacles preventing Washington from garnering� support for a UN resolution
that imposes tough sanctions or paves the way for a military strike. First, the
rush to pass an enforceable resolution in the Security Council is dissonantly
similar to the rush before the invasion of Iraq. No country wants to watch a
sequel to the Iraq war.���
Second, oil prices continue to increase, topping $70 per barrel. Demand for
oil is also on the rise, especially in China, a major importer of Iranian oil.
Tehran has even threatened to use oil as a weapon against the West should the
U.S. further escalate this crisis. Any drastic move on the geo-political scene
will negatively impact global energy markets, including in the U. S. where gas
prices have averaged nearly $3.00 per gallon.
Finally, the U.S. must overcome the hurdle of China and Russia, veto-wielding
members of the Security Council. Both countries, which have close economic ties
to Iran, oppose sanctions or using force against the Islamic republic.
Russian President, Vladimir Putin has already voiced his opposition, saying
the IAEA "mustn't shrug this role from its shoulders and pass it on to the U.N.
Security Council."
Tehran appears to be raising an olive branch of compromise in an attempt to
keep its nuclear file out of the Security Council.
The head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Mohammad Saeedi, recently
announced that Iran is now fully willing to answer the IAEA's questions about
its nuclear program within three weeks. Tehran is also prepared to resume
surprise UN inspections of its nuclear facilities. Additionally, Iran has stated
that Moscow's earlier proposal to enrich uranium on Russian soil is back on the
negotiating table. All these 11th-hour concessions are being made on the
condition that Iran's nuclear file remains in the IAEA.
Following the IAEA report, President Bush said that the world is united
over Iran's nuclear ambitions, and that "diplomatic options are just beginning."
But Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has taken a more assertive stance,
saying that the U.S. and its allies "would be able and willing to look at
additional measures if the Security Council does not move quickly enough."
While the political jockeying at the United Nations appears to be heading for
failure, one can only guess what "additional measures" Rice has in mind.
Links� The
way to beat Iran's confrontationists Washington and
Tehran: The Sniper and the Window? Iran
will not give in to bullying
pressure
|